Uniform Consensus is Harder than Consensus ( extended abstract )
نویسندگان
چکیده
We compare the consensus problem with the uniform consensus problem in synchronous systems. In contrast to consensus, uniform consensus is not solvable in synchronous systems with byzantine failures. This still holds for the omission failure model if a majority of processes may be faulty. For the crash failure model, both consensus and uniform consensus are solvable, no matter how many processes are faulty. We consider this failure model and we examine the number of rounds required to reach a decision in consensus and uniform consensus algorithms. We show that compared with the best consensus algorithm, any uniform consensus algorithm takes at least one additional round to take a decision. We thus prove that uniform consensus is also harder than consensus whatever the failure model is.
منابع مشابه
Uniform consensus is harder than consensus
We compare the consensus and uniform consensus problems in synchronous systems. In contrast to consensus, uniform consensus is not solvable with byzantine failures. This still holds for the omission failure model if a majority of processes may be faulty. For the crash failure model, both consensus and uniform consensus are solvable, no matter how many processes are faulty. In this failure model...
متن کاملRevisiting the Relationship between Non-blocking Atomic Commitment and Consensus ?
This paper discusses the relationship between the Non-Blocking Atomic Commitment problem (NB-AC) and the Consensus problem in asynchronous systems with unreliable failure detectors. We rst connrm that NB-AC is harder than Consensus. In contrast to Consensus , NB-AC is impossible to solve with unreliable failure detectors even with a single crash failure. We deene a weaker problem than NB-AC, ca...
متن کاملRevistiting the Relationship Between Non-Blocking Atomic Commitment and Consensus
This paper discusses the relationship between the Non-Blocking Atomic Commitment problem (NB-AC) and the Consensus problem in asynchronous systems with unreliable failure detectors. We rst connrm that NB-AC is harder than Consensus. In contrast to Consensus , NB-AC is impossible to solve with unreliable failure detectors even with a single crash failure. We deene a weaker problem than NB-AC, ca...
متن کاملA Realistic Look At Failure Detectors
This paper shows that, in an environment where we do not bound the number of faulty processes, the class P of Perfect failure detectors is the weakest (among realistic failure detectors) to solve fundamental agreement problems like uniform consensus, atomic broadcast, and terminating reliable broadcast (also called Byzantine Generals). Roughly speaking, in this environment, we collapse the Chan...
متن کاملAdaptive timeliness of consensus in presence of crash and timing faults
The ∆-timed uniform consensus is a stronger variant of the traditional consensus and it satisfies the following additional property: Every correct process terminates its execution within a constant time ∆ (∆-timeliness), and no two processes decide differently (Uniformity). In this paper, we consider the ∆-timed uniform consensus problem in presence of fc crash processes and ft timing-faulty pr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000